Child Abuse Law
  • Home
    • About
  • Case Law
  • CICA Claims
  • Contact
  • Blog

INSURANCE

KR AND OTHERS VERSUS ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE PLC [2006] EWCA Civ 1454
This was an appeal from the judgment of Simon J in KR And Others Versus Royal & Sun Alliance Plc [2006] EWHC 48 (QB). The background to the case of widespread allegations of abuse in residential children’s home in North Wales between 1974 and 1997, many of which gave rise to civil claims against the Defendant, Bryn Alyn Community Holdings (now in liquidation), which was insured by the Royal and Sun Alliance. Fifteen lead cases were chosen to be tried by Connell J and judgment was given in favour of thirteen of those cases. There was then an appeal and cross appeal in which the thirteen Claimants were successful. The thirteen Claimants then brought proceedings against the insurer, the Royal and Sun Alliance. Full report here.

KR AND OTHERS VERSUS ROYAL & SUN ALLIANCE PLC [2006] EWHC 48 (QB) 
Eight Claimants claimed against the Royal and Sun Alliance pursuant to section 1 of the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 1930 (“the 1930 Act”). They were all residents of a number of children’s care homes in North Wales, known as the Bryn Alyn Community (“Bryn Alyn”). Bryn Alyn Community (Holdings) Limited (“the Company”) was incorporated in 1972 and in 1973 it took over the operation of the business, which did well for around two decades until it ended in financial failure in 1997 when it went into voluntary liquidation.
 Full report here.


Contact Us

    Subscribe to Updates Today!

Submit

The contents of this site remains the sole responsibility of Malcolm Johnson as a private individual, and is not endorsed by any business by which he is employed.  In particular Malcolm Johnson does not hold himself out as preparing this website for or on behalf of any business by which he is employed, or as having been authorised by any business or employer to do so.  It is not intended to stand as legal advice in any particular case, and should not be relied upon as such.   To the extent permitted by law, Malcolm Johnson will not be liable by reason of breach of contract, negligence, or otherwise for any loss of consequential loss occasioned to any person acting omitting to act or refraining from acting in reliance upon the website material or arising from or connected with any error or omission in the website material.    Consequential loss shall be deemed to include, but is not limited to, any loss of profits or anticipated profits, damage to reputation, or goodwill, loss of business or anticipated business, damages, costs, expenses incurred or payable to any third party or any other indirect or consequential losses.

  • Home
    • About
  • Case Law
  • CICA Claims
  • Contact
  • Blog