Child Abuse Law
  • Home
    • About
  • Case Law
  • CICA Claims
  • Contact
  • Blog

ORAL PENETRATION

CICA V FIRST TIER TRIBUNAL AND JC [2011] UKUT 77  
The Applicant had made an application to the CICA under the 2001 Scheme in relation to an incident when her ex-husband forcibly penetrated her mouth with his penis. The CICA made an award of £3,300 (Level 7) for that part of her injury, because it fell under the category “indecent assault – severe – non penile penetrative and/or oral-genital act or acts” in the 2001 Scheme rather than rape. The Applicant appealed on the grounds that the Sexual Offences Act 2003 had extended the definition of rape to include oral penetration. Full report here.
​​

Contact Us

    Subscribe to Updates Today!

Submit

The contents of this site remains the sole responsibility of Malcolm Johnson as a private individual, and is not endorsed by any business by which he is employed.  In particular Malcolm Johnson does not hold himself out as preparing this website for or on behalf of any business by which he is employed, or as having been authorised by any business or employer to do so.  It is not intended to stand as legal advice in any particular case, and should not be relied upon as such.   To the extent permitted by law, Malcolm Johnson will not be liable by reason of breach of contract, negligence, or otherwise for any loss of consequential loss occasioned to any person acting omitting to act or refraining from acting in reliance upon the website material or arising from or connected with any error or omission in the website material.    Consequential loss shall be deemed to include, but is not limited to, any loss of profits or anticipated profits, damage to reputation, or goodwill, loss of business or anticipated business, damages, costs, expenses incurred or payable to any third party or any other indirect or consequential losses.

  • Home
    • About
  • Case Law
  • CICA Claims
  • Contact
  • Blog