R (KS) v FIRST TIER TRIBUNAL [2012] UKUT 281 
The Applicant applied to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, and received compensation of £1875 for minor facial disfigurement and minor scarring to her lower limbs. She applied for a review arguing that she had post traumatic stress disorder. That was refused on the grounds that she had not provided supporting evidence. The letter of refusal was sent on the 24th August 2010, but she did not lodge her appeal until October 2011. The First Tier Tribunal refused to admit her appeal, and she was given permission to apply for judicial review.   Full report here.
​​
R(KS) V FIRST TIER TRIBUNAL (CIC) [2012] UKUT 281
The Applicant applied to the CICA for compensation arising out of an assault on the 11th August 2004 and received compensation for minor physical injuries. She applied for a review, arguing that she had post traumatic stress disorder but was turned down on the grounds that she had no psychiatric evidence. Its letter notifying her of its decision was dated the 24th August 2010, and she had a right of appeal. However she did not lodge her appeal until October 2011.     Full report here.
​​
R (VAA) v FIRST TIER TRIBUNAL [2010] UKUT 36 
The Applicant challenged a decision of the FTT concerning a claim made to the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, which refused his request for an extension of time to appeal from the Authority’s review decision rejecting his claim.  He had made his claim under the 2001 Scheme, but was turned down, and so he applied for a review. The decision under review was sent to him by letter on the 19th September 2007 rejecting his claim.    Full report here.
​​

Contact Us

    Subscribe to Updates Today!

The contents of this site remains the sole responsibility of Malcolm Johnson as a private individual, and is not endorsed by any business by which he is employed.  In particular Malcolm Johnson does not hold himself out as preparing this website for or on behalf of any business by which he is employed, or as having been authorised by any business or employer to do so.  It is not intended to stand as legal advice in any particular case, and should not be relied upon as such.   To the extent permitted by law, Malcolm Johnson will not be liable by reason of breach of contract, negligence, or otherwise for any loss of consequential loss occasioned to any person acting omitting to act or refraining from acting in reliance upon the website material or arising from or connected with any error or omission in the website material.    Consequential loss shall be deemed to include, but is not limited to, any loss of profits or anticipated profits, damage to reputation, or goodwill, loss of business or anticipated business, damages, costs, expenses incurred or payable to any third party or any other indirect or consequential losses.